The tutorial shows the most simple usage of the library. It is assumed that the reader is familiar with the use of standard containers. Although the tutorial is divided into sections, it is recommended to read it all from top to bottom.
The most important aspect of a pointer container is that it manages memory. This means that in most cases there is no need to worry about deleting memory.
Let us assume, an OO-hierarchy of animals
class animal : boost::noncopyable { public: virtual ~animal() {} virtual void eat() = 0; virtual int age() const = 0; // ... }; class mammal : public animal { // ... }; class bird : public animal { // ... };
Then the managing of the animals is straight-forward. Imagine a Zoo:
class zoo { boost::ptr_vector<animal> the_animals; public: void add_animal( animal* a ) { the_animals.push_back( a ); } };
Notice how just pass the class name to the container; there is no * to indicate it is a pointer. With this declaration, now say:
zoo the_zoo; the_zoo.add_animal( new mammal("joe") ); the_zoo.add_animal( new bird("dodo") );
Thus, heap-allocate all elements of the container and never rely on copy-semantics.
As particular feature of the pointer containers is that the query interface is indirected. For example,
boost::ptr_vector<animal> vec; vec.push_back( new animal ); // you add it as pointer ... vec[0].eat(); // but get a reference back
This indirection also happens to iterators, so
typedef std::vector<animal*> std_vec; std_vec vec; ... std_vec::iterator i = vec.begin(); (*i)->eat(); // '*' needed
now becomes
typedef boost::ptr_vector<animal> ptr_vec; ptr_vec vec; ptr_vec::iterator i = vec.begin(); i->eat(); // no indirection needed
The sequence containers used when there is no need to keep an ordering on the elements. Basically expect all operations of the normal standard containers to be available. So, for example, with a ptr_deque and ptr_list object the user can say:
boost::ptr_deque<animal> deq; deq.push_front( new animal ); deq.pop_front();
because std::deque and std::list has push_front() and pop_front members.
If the standard sequence support random access, so does the pointer container; for example:
for( boost::ptr_deque<animal>::size_type i = 0u; i != deq.size(); ++i ) deq[i].eat();
The ptr_vector also allows the user to specify the size of the buffer to allocate; for example
boost::ptr_vector<animal> animals( 10u );
will reserve room for 10 animals.
To keep an ordering on the animals, use a ptr_set:
boost::ptr_set<animal> set; set.insert( new monkey("bobo") ); set.insert( new whale("anna") ); ...
This requires that operator<() is defined for animals. One way to do this could be
inline bool operator<( const animal& l, const animal& r ) { return l.name() < r.name(); }
to keep the animals sorted by name.
To keep all the animals in zoo ordered with respect to their name, but it so happens that many animals have the same name. Then use a ptr_multimap:
typedef boost::ptr_multimap<std::string,animal> zoo_type; zoo_type zoo; std::string bobo = "bobo", anna = "anna"; zoo.insert( bobo, new monkey(bobo) ); zoo.insert( bobo, new elephant(bobo) ); zoo.insert( anna, new whale(anna) ); zoo.insert( anna, new emu(anna) );
Note that must create the key as an lvalue (due to exception-safety issues); the following would not have compiled
zoo.insert( "bobo", // this is bad, but you get compile error new monkey("bobo") );
If a multimap is not needed, use operator[]() to avoid the clumsiness:
boost::ptr_map<std::string,animal> animals; animals["bobo"].set_name("bobo");
This requires a default constructor for animals and a function to do the initialization, in this case set_name().
A better alternative is to use Boost.Assign. In particular, consider
For example, the above insertion may now be written
boost::ptr_multimap<std::string,animal> animals; using namespace boost::assign; ptr_map_insert<monkey>( animals )( "bobo", "bobo" ); ptr_map_insert<elephant>( animals )( "bobo", "bobo" ); ptr_map_insert<whale>( animals )( "anna", "anna" ); ptr_map_insert<emu>( animals )( "anna", "anna" );
By default, if the user inserts null into a container, an exception is thrown. To allow nulls, say so explicitly when declaring the container variable
boost::ptr_vector< boost::nullable<animal> > animals_type; animals_type animals; ... animals.insert( animals.end(), new dodo("fido") ); animals.insert( animals.begin(), 0 ) // ok
Once a null is inserted into the container, always check if the value is null before accessing the object
for( animals_type::iterator i = animals.begin(); i != animals.end(); ++i ) { if( !boost::is_null(i) ) // always check for validity i->eat(); }
If the container supports random access, check this as
for( animals_type::size_type i = 0u; i != animals.size(); ++i ) { if( !animals.is_null(i) ) animals[i].eat(); }
Note that it is meaningless to insert null into ptr_set and ptr_multiset.
In OO programming it is typical to prohibit copying of objects; the objects may sometimes be allowed to be clonable; for example,:
animal* animal::clone() const { return do_clone(); // implemented by private virtual function }
If the OO hierarchy thus allows cloning, tell the pointer containers how cloning is to be done. This is simply done by defining a free-standing function, new_clone(), in the same namespace as the object hierarchy:
inline animal* new_clone( const animal& a ) { return a.clone(); }
That is all, now a lot of functions in a pointer container can exploit the clonability of the animal objects. For example
typedef boost::ptr_list<animal> zoo_type; zoo_type zoo, another_zoo; ... another_zoo.assign( zoo.begin(), zoo.end() );
will fill another zoo with clones of the first zoo. Similarly, insert() can now insert clones into the pointer container
another_zoo.insert( another_zoo.begin(), zoo.begin(), zoo.end() );
The whole container can now also be cloned
zoo_type yet_another_zoo = zoo.clone();
A few new functions make sense when working with pointers, . For example, to remove an animal from the zoo
zoo_type::auto_type the_animal = zoo.release( zoo.begin() ); the_animal->eat(); animal* the_animal_ptr = the_animal.release(); // now this is not deleted zoo.release(2); // for random access containers
Think of auto_type as a non-copyable form of std::auto_ptr. Notice that when an object is released, the pointer is removed from the container and the containers size shrinks. For containers that store nulls, exploit that auto_type is convertible to bool:
if( ptr_vector< nullable<T> >::auto_type r = vec.pop_back() ) { ... }
Release the entire container to return it from a function
std::auto_ptr< boost::ptr_deque<animal> > get_zoo() { boost::ptr_deque<animal> result; ... return result.release(); // give up ownership } ... boost::ptr_deque<animal> animals = get_zoo();
To move an animal object from one zoo to another. In other words, to move the animal and the responsibility of it to another zoo
another_zoo.transfer( another_zoo.end(), // insert before end zoo.begin(), // insert this animal ... zoo ); // from this container
This kind of "move-semantics" is different from normal value-based containers. Think of transfer() as the same as splice() on std::list.
To replace an element,do:
zoo_type::auto_type old_animal = zoo.replace( zoo.begin(), new monkey("bibi") ); zoo.replace( 2, old_animal.release() ); // for random access containers
A map is slightly different to iterator over than standard maps. Now say,
typedef boost::ptr_map<std::string, boost::nullable<animal> > animal_map; animal_map map; ... for( animal_map::const_iterator i = map.begin(), e = map.end(); i != e; ++i ) { std::cout << "\n key: " << i->first; std::cout << "\n age: "; if( boost::is_null(i) ) std::cout << "unknown"; else std::cout << i->second->age(); }
Except for the check for null, this looks like it would with a normal map. But if age() had not been a const member function, it would not have compiled.
Maps can also be indexed with bounds-checking
try { animal& bobo = map.at("bobo"); } catch( boost::bad_ptr_container_operation& e ) { // "bobo" not found }
Every time there is a function that takes a T* parameter, there is also a function taking an std::auto_ptr<U> parameter. This is of course done to make the library integrate with std::auto_ptr. For example
std::ptr_vector<Base> vec;
vec.push_back( new Base );
is complemented by
std::auto_ptr<Derived> p( new Derived );
vec.push_back( p );
Notice that the template argument for std::auto_ptr does not need to follow the template argument for ptr_vector as long as Derived* can be implicitly converted to Base*.
Unfortunately it is not possible to use pointer containers with mutating algorithms from the standard library. However, the most useful ones are instead provided as member functions:
boost::ptr_vector<animal> zoo; ... zoo.sort(); // assume 'bool operator<( const animal&, const animal& )' zoo.sort( std::less<animal>() ); // the same, notice no '*' is present zoo.sort( zoo.begin(), zoo.begin() + 5 ); // sort selected range
Notice that predicates are automatically wrapped in an indirect_fun object.
Remove equal and adjacent elements using unique():
zoo.unique(); // assume 'bool operator==( const animal&, const animal& )'
zoo.unique( zoo.begin(), zoo.begin() + 5, my_comparison_predicate() );
To remove certain elements, use erase_if:
zoo.erase_if( my_predicate() );
Finally, to merge together two sorted containers:
boost::ptr_vector<animal> another_zoo = ...; another_zoo.sort(); // sorted wrt. to same order as 'zoo' zoo.merge( another_zoo ); BOOST_ASSERT( another_zoo.empty() );
©Thorsten Ottosen 2004-2006. Use, modification and distribution is subject to the Boost Software License, Version 1.0 (see http://www.boost.org/LICENSE_1_0.txt). |
|
---|